LATTICE AUTH

Built on Unbreakable Math

Seed Round: $500K-750K

December 2025

Benjamin Rizkin, PhD

Founder & CEO

projecthelixHQ@gmail.com

(978) 399-8730

Why Now

The Perfect Timing Window

Three Forces Converging in 2025-2027

1. NIST Standards Finalized

August 2024

  • FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) published
  • FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA) published
  • Federal agencies must migrate by 2035
  • Removes uncertainty, enables enterprise adoption

2. Quantum Progress Accelerating

6,100 Qubits (IBM, 2025)

  • Conservative: RSA-2048 breaks 2030-2035
  • "Harvest now, decrypt later" attacks active
  • Any RSA data today vulnerable tomorrow

3. Regulatory Mandate Building

  • US: Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act (2022)
  • EU: NIS2 Directive (2024) recommends PQC migration
  • Pharma: DSCSA Phase 3 enforcement (2023-2027)
  • Expectation: FDA PQC guidance by 2026-2027
2025-2027

The Goldilocks Window: Problem recognized, standards finalized, competitors haven't adapted

The Problem

Quantum Computers Will Break Authentication by 2035

Real-World Scenario: September 2024

"A major pharmaceutical company recalled $47M of product because their serialization system was compromised using a 2048-bit RSA vulnerability. This will happen again—until the industry adopts post-quantum cryptography."

The Quantum Threat

  • NIST published post-quantum standards (August 2024)
  • Conservative estimates: RSA/ECDSA breaks by 2030-2035
  • "Harvest now, decrypt later" attacks happening today
  • Federal agencies must migrate by 2035

Who's Vulnerable

  • Pharma Serialization: Every system uses RSA/ECDSA
  • Fine Art: NFTs and blockchain use ECDSA
  • Regulatory Risk: FDA/EMA will require PQC
  • Cost: $50M+ recalls when systems fail

Systems deployed today will still be operational when quantum computers break them

The Solution

We're Not Building Another Blockchain

Why NFTs & Blockchain Will Fail

Quantum Vulnerability: Every blockchain uses ECDSA signatures. When quantum computers break ECDSA (2030-2035), every NFT authentication becomes worthless overnight.
Platform Dependency: Your authentication only works while Ethereum/Polygon/etc exist. 50 years from now? Good luck.
No Physical Binding: A digital signature proves nothing about the physical object you're holding.

Requirement NFTs/Blockchain LATTICE AUTH
Survives quantum computers ❌ ECDSA breaks 2030-2035 ✅ ML-DSA (NIST approved)
Works without internet ❌ Requires RPC node ✅ Self-contained packages
No platform dependency ❌ Dies with blockchain ✅ Standalone verification
Physical certificate ❌ Digital only ✅ Laser-etched hologram
Cost per item $50-500 gas fees $149/mo unlimited
Still works in 2075 ❌ Platform risk ✅ Cryptographic proof

Our Approach: Dual-Layer Authentication

1. Post-Quantum Cryptography

  • ML-DSA (NIST FIPS 204) - Lattice-based
  • SLH-DSA (NIST FIPS 205) - Hash-based
  • Algorithm-agile (future-proof)
  • Offline verification (no network calls)

2. Holographic Physical Binding

  • Laser-etched interference patterns
  • Derived from digital signature
  • Unforgeable without $150K laser equipment
  • Verifiable with smartphone + laser pointer

We're Not Digitizing Authentication

We're creating unforgeable physical-digital certificates that work without blockchain, without platforms, and without quantum vulnerability. The cryptography is unbreakable. The hologram is physically bound to the signature. The artifact survives 50+ years.

See It In Action

Interactive Hologram Demo

This is what galleries buy. The same technology secures pharmaceutical serialization. Tilt the hologram, upload your own image, see the quantum-resistant signature in real-time.

Tilt: 45°
Overlay: 60%
KEY: ████████
Rhein II
Andreas Gursky, 1999
Tilt
45°
Layers
3
Complex
30%
Green → Cyan → Blue

Traction

Technical Validation Complete

MVP Built & Production-Ready

First customers in 90 days post-funding

Technical Milestones

  • ML-DSA + SLH-DSA implementation complete
  • 2D holographic interference patterns
  • Self-contained artifact packages
  • Cryptographic agility framework
  • Zero quantum-vulnerable dependencies

Platform Status

  • Backend: Express.js + TypeScript ✓
  • Frontend: React + Vite ✓
  • Crypto: @noble/post-quantum ✓
  • Hologram: Physics-based patterns ✓
  • Deployment: Docker + edge-ready ✓

Why Now

NIST Standards: ML-DSA and SLH-DSA published August 2024 - removes uncertainty for enterprise adoption
Market Timing: Problem recognized, competitors haven't adapted, 18-24 month first-mover window
Regulatory Momentum: Federal mandate for PQC migration by 2035, pharma will follow

Business Model

Unit Economics & Pricing

Fine Art Pricing

$149/month

Artist subscription (unlimited works)

Unit Economics:

  • CAC: $500 (targeted outreach)
  • LTV: $5,000 (28-month avg retention)
  • LTV:CAC = 10:1
  • Gross Margin: 70%

Pharmaceutical Pricing

$50K

6-month pilot deployment

$150K-300K/year

Production license per site

Unit Economics:

  • CAC: $25K (enterprise sales)
  • LTV: $750K (5-year contract)
  • LTV:CAC = 30:1
  • Gross Margin: 60%

Capital Efficiency Through AI Automation

Internal tooling: 6 AI agents handle operations, marketing, sales support
Team structure: Founder + contracted specialists (design, validation, regulatory)
Result: $40K/month burn vs $75K+ for traditional startup (47% lower)

Customer Acquisition Strategy

How We Get to 50 Artists & 3 Pharma Pilots

Art Market (Months 1-12)

Target: 70 Artists

What Artists Get:

  • Quantum-proof authenticity certificates (survives 50+ years)
  • Physical hologram (laser-etched, unforgeable)
  • Self-contained verification (no platform dependency)
  • Edition management & provenance tracking
  • Collector confidence → price support

How This Differentiates:

  • vs NFTs: Works without crypto wallet, survives blockchain obsolescence
  • vs Traditional CoAs: Cryptographically verifiable, not just paper
  • vs Nothing: Professional collectors require authentication for $10K+ works

Acquisition Channels:

  • Gallery Partnerships (30%): White-label deals with 3-5 galleries
  • Trade Shows (40%): AIPAD, Paris Photo, Art Basel Miami
  • Direct Outreach (20%): LinkedIn to fine art photographers
  • Inbound (10%): Content marketing, gallery referrals

Pharmaceutical (Months 6-24)

Target: 5 Pilots by Month 24

What CMC Teams Get:

  • Post-quantum serialization (FDA-ready for 2035+ mandate)
  • 21 CFR Part 11 compliant from day one
  • Offline verification (works in GMP manufacturing environments)
  • Counterfeit protection that survives quantum computers
  • First-mover advantage before competitors adapt

How This Differentiates:

  • vs TraceLink/Optel: They're adding PQC signatures to legacy systems (platform-dependent)
  • vs Doing Nothing: Regulatory risk when FDA issues PQC guidance (~2026-2027)
  • vs In-house Build: 2+ year development, validation burden

Acquisition Channels:

  • Founder Network (60%): Direct intros to CMC leaders
  • Industry Conferences (30%): PDA, ISPE, CASSS
  • Strategic Partnerships (10%): CDMO validation services

Go-to-Market Strategy

Two Parallel Tracks

Why Both: Different Animals, Same Technology

Art provides cash flow and proof-of-concept while pharma deals mature. Different sales motions, different customer profiles, but the same underlying quantum-resistant authentication platform.

Track 1: Art Authentication (B2C/SMB)

Phase 1: Months 1-12

  • Sales Motion: Direct to artist subscriptions
  • Channels: Gallery partnerships (white-label), trade shows
  • Cycle: 30-day sales cycles
  • Pricing: $149-249/month
  • Onboarding: Self-serve platform

Milestone: 70 artists, $125K ARR

Track 2: Pharma Serialization (Enterprise)

Phase 2: Months 12-24

  • Sales Motion: CMC leader outreach (founder network)
  • Channels: Direct enterprise sales, industry conferences
  • Cycle: 12-18 month sales cycles
  • Pricing: $50K pilots → $150-300K/year production
  • Validation: 21 CFR Part 11 compliance requirements

Milestone: 3 pilots, $1M ARR

Resource Allocation

  • Founder: 70% pharma (enterprise sales, pilot management), 30% art (gallery partnerships, strategic direction)
  • Marketing contractor: 80% art (content, trade shows, lead gen), 20% pharma (thought leadership, conference presence)
  • Sales tools: Self-serve platform for art, founder-led for pharma

Phase 3: Platform Scale (Months 24-36)

Luxury goods • Legal documents • Research data • Museums/archives

Milestone: $5M ARR, Series A ready

Competitive Landscape

Our Moat: Integration + First-Mover Partnerships

Feature NFTs/Blockchain LATTICE AUTH
Quantum-resistant ❌ ECDSA ✅ ML-DSA
Works offline ❌ Needs RPC ✅ Self-contained
Cost per item $50-500 gas $149-249 flat
Survives 50 years ❌ Platform risk ✅ Standalone
Physical certificate ❌ Digital only ✅ Hologram

Pharma Serialization Competitors

Why Incumbents Won't Catch Up Fast:

  • TraceLink/Optel Technical Debt: Legacy serialization systems built on RSA/ECDSA (10+ years old)
  • Platform-dependent architecture: Requires network calls, can't work offline
  • Enterprise migration cycles: Their customer base requires 18-24 month validation cycles
  • Adding signatures ≠ physical binding: ML-DSA module doesn't solve holographic authentication

18-Month Window: NIST publication (Aug 2024) to incumbent product releases (est. Q1 2026). We're signing customers in this gap.

Art Authentication Competitors

  • Verisart: Blockchain (ECDSA vulnerable), platform-dependent
  • Artory: Centralized database, no cryptographic binding
  • Our advantage: Quantum-proof + physical hologram

Our First-Mover Advantages

  • Gallery partnerships locked in: 3-year white-label contracts (Months 6-9), switching costs for artists
  • Pharma pilots signed: Before incumbents release PQC modules, validation cycles create moat
  • Built quantum-resistant from day one: No technical debt, greenfield advantage
  • Offline verification architecture: Physical hologram supply chain established (vendor partnerships)
  • Regulatory expertise: 15 years pharma experience, FDA validation strategy built-in

Market Opportunity

Honest Market Sizing

Total Addressable Market (TAM)

$2.3B
Pharma Serialization Software
$2.6B
Art Authentication Market
$4.9B
Total TAM

Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM)

$250M

  • Cell & gene therapy serialization
  • Fine art photographers (60K in US)
  • High-value art market ($50K+ works)
  • Early adopter pharmaceutical sites

Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM)

$12.5M by Year 3

  • Target: 5% of SAM
  • 200+ art installations
  • 10+ pharmaceutical sites
  • Expanding to luxury goods

Market Drivers

Regulatory: US DSCSA, EU FMD, pending FDA PQC guidance
Technology: NIST standards finalized August 2024
Economics: $50M+ cost of serialization system failures

Team

Deep Domain Expertise + Technical Execution

Benjamin Rizkin, PhD - Founder & CEO

Pharmaceutical Operations (15+ years)

  • Senior Director, Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls Program Management
  • Multiple FDA approvals (Vyalev, Venclexta, Navitoclax, adrabetadex, rilparencel)
  • Prior: AbbVie, Nalu Bio, Beren/Mandos, Sunthetics, NYU
  • 6 patents in pharma/biotech domains

Technical & Entrepreneurial

  • PhD Chemical Engineering, NYU
  • Post-quantum crypto implementation
  • Full-stack software architecture
  • Built AI automation systems
  • Founded multiple ventures

Why This Founder Wins

Vision-Driven: Sees quantum threat 5-10 years before market, building infrastructure for 50+ year horizon
Domain Expertise: buotech strategy and operations, knows FDA compliance from CMC perspective, regulatory strategy
Technical Execution: PhD engineer who can architect complex systems, implemented production PQC
Capital Efficient: AI-first mindset, extremely lean pre-seed operations, founder-led execution

Financial Projections

Conservative, Achievable Path to $1.2M ARR

Metric Month 6 Month 12 Month 18 Month 24
Art Customers 15 70 150 200
Art ARR $27K $125K $268K $358K
Pharma Pilots 0 1 starting 3 active 5 (2 prod)
Pharma ARR $0 $25K $150K $600K
Total ARR $27K $150K $418K $958K
Monthly Burn $40K $45K $55K $65K

Use of Funds ($500-750K)

  • Product & Validation (40%): $200-300K
    Hologram prototyping, pharma validation, security audits
  • Go-to-Market (35%): $175-263K
    Trade shows, partnerships, content marketing
  • Operations (25%): $125-188K
    Founder salary, contractors, infrastructure

Key Assumptions

  • Art: 20% MoM growth Months 1-6, 15% thereafter
  • Art churn: 15% annual (28-month avg retention)
  • Pharma: 6-month pilot → 12-month conversion
  • Pharma close rate: 40% of pilots
  • Break-even: Month 22 (~$65K MRR)

Sensitivity Analysis

Scenario Month 24 ARR Runway Risk Factors
Base Case ($625K) $958K 15 months 20% MoM art growth, 40% pharma conversion
Conservative ($500K) $680K 12 months 15% MoM art growth, 25% pharma conversion, 6-month pilot delays
Aggressive ($750K) $1.2M 18 months 25% MoM art growth, 50% pharma conversion

Key Assumption Risks:
• Art churn: Modeled 15% annual, could be 25% if value prop unclear
• Pharma pilot → production: 12-month conversion assumes no regulatory delays
• Gallery partnerships: Modeled 30% of customers, requires white-label agreements

Justification for Range: Conservative case ($500K) still hits break-even Month 22 with $680K ARR. Aggressive case ($750K) extends runway to 18 months and accelerates pharma validation budget. 60% premium accounts for uncertainty in pharma pilot timing.

Risks & Mitigation

How We Handle the Biggest Threats

Risk: Competitors Move Faster

TraceLink/Optel add ML-DSA signatures in 6 months

Mitigation:

  • Lock in gallery partnerships (white-label contracts)
  • Sign pharma pilots before they adapt
  • Our moat is integration + physical binding, not just crypto
  • 18-24 month validation cycles for incumbents to revalidate

Risk: Pharma Adoption Too Slow

18-24 month enterprise sales cycles

Mitigation:

  • Art market provides cash flow during pharma ramp
  • Target cell/gene therapy (faster decision-making)
  • Founder network enables warm intros

Risk: Regulatory Changes

FDA issues different PQC guidance

Mitigation:

  • Platform is algorithm-agile (supports multiple PQC standards)
  • NIST standards are federal default
  • 15 years regulatory experience on team

Risk: "Feature, Not Product"

Could incumbents just add this as a module?

Mitigation:

  • Physical hologram integration requires new manufacturing
  • Platform play across industries (not just one vertical)
  • First-mover partnerships create switching costs

Intellectual Property Strategy

4 Patentable Innovations

1. Holographic Pattern Generation

Method for generating laser interference patterns from post-quantum digital signatures, creating physically verifiable authentication

2. Offline Verification Protocol

System for cryptographic verification of PQC-signed physical assets without network connectivity or platform dependency

3. Hybrid Cryptographic Agility

Framework for maintaining multiple PQC algorithms in single artifact package, enabling future-proof authentication

4. Physical-Digital Binding

Process for cryptographically linking holographic physical certificates to digital signatures via content-derived interference patterns

Filing Strategy

Seed Round: Provisional patent applications (4 innovations, ~$8K)
Series A: Full utility patents + international filing (PCT, ~$40K)
Trade Secrets: Specific hologram fabrication parameters, calibration algorithms

Market Research

Evidence-Based Sizing

Pharmaceutical Serialization Software Market

Market Size (Source: Mordor Intelligence):

  • 2024: $2.3B
  • 2030: $4.7B (CAGR 12.8%)
  • Cell & gene therapy subset: $30B drug market by 2030
  • US DSCSA compliance: $1.3B spend (2023-2027)

Key Players:

  • TraceLink: $300M+ ARR, 3,000 employees
  • Optel Group: $250M+ revenue, 2,000 employees
  • Systech, Antares Vision, Authentix
  • All using quantum-vulnerable cryptography

Fine Art Authentication Market

Market Size (Source: Grand View Research):

  • Global art market: $65B (2023)
  • Digital authentication: $2.6B (2024) → $6.5B (2034)
  • Fine art photographers: 60K+ in US
  • Avg artwork value: $5K-50K

Competitors:

  • Verisart: Blockchain-based (ECDSA)
  • Artory: Centralized registry
  • Traditional authentication services
  • No quantum-resistant solutions exist

Post-Quantum Cryptography Market

  • Market: $300M (2024) → $4.2B (2032), 36% CAGR (Source: Markets and Markets)
  • Drivers: NIST standardization, federal mandate, quantum computing progress
  • Timeline: Federal agencies must migrate by 2035 (OMB M-23-02)

Traction Timeline

Next 12 Months Post-Funding

Months 1-3: Beta Launch

  • Week 1-2: Close seed round, onboard advisors
  • Week 3-6: 5 beta artists (50% discount)
  • Week 7-12: Iterate based on feedback
  • Milestone: Product-market fit validation

Months 4-6: Trade Show Pipeline

  • AIPAD (April): Target 10 artist signups
  • PDA (May): 3 pharma discovery meetings
  • Paris Photo (June): 5 artist signups
  • Milestone: 15 total artists, $27K ARR

Months 7-9: Gallery Partnerships

  • Sign 2 gallery white-label agreements
  • Launch first pharma pilot (cell therapy)
  • Security audit completion
  • Milestone: 45 artists, 1 pilot, $80K ARR

Months 10-12: Scale & Validate

  • Reach 70 art installations
  • Complete first pharma pilot
  • Start 2 additional pharma pilots
  • Milestone: $150K ARR, Series A prep

Key Performance Indicators

Month 3: 5 beta artists, product-market fit confirmed
Month 6: 15 artists, $27K ARR, first pharma pilot signed
Month 9: 45 artists, $80K ARR, 2 gallery partnerships
Month 12: 70 artists, $150K ARR, 3 pharma pilots active

Team Buildout & Competencies

Month 1-6 (Seed Close):

  • Founder (100%): Enterprise sales (pharma), gallery partnerships, product strategy
  • Marketing Contractor (20 hrs/week): Content marketing, trade show logistics, SEO
  • Design Contractor (as needed): Pitch materials, hologram prototyping
  • AI Automation: Customer support, CRM management, analytics

Month 7-12 (First Pharma Pilot):

  • Founder (100%): 70% pharma sales, 30% art partnerships
  • Marketing Contractor (30 hrs/week): Trade show execution, lead gen
  • Regulatory Consultant (as needed): 21 CFR Part 11 validation support
  • Gallery Relations (founder-led): White-label partnerships, artist onboarding

Month 13-18 (Scaling):

  • Add: Junior Sales Rep (pharma outreach, pilot management)
  • Add: Customer Success Manager (art market, gallery support)
  • Founder shifts to: Strategic sales, product roadmap, Series A prep

Competency Coverage:

  • Enterprise pharma sales: Founder (15+ years CMC experience)
  • Regulatory/compliance: Founder + contractors
  • Marketing/content: Contractor + AI tools
  • Technical/product: Founder (PhD, full-stack)
  • ⚠️ Art market sales: Founder learning + gallery partnerships
  • ⚠️ Hologram fabrication: Vendor partnerships (not in-house)

The Ask

$500K-750K Seed Round

Funding Structure

Amount: $500K minimum, $750K target
Instrument: SAFE
Valuation Cap: $5M-6M
Discount: 20%
Close Date: Q1 2026

12-Month Milestones ($500K)

  • 70 art installations
  • 1 cell therapy pilot complete
  • $150K ARR
  • Security audit passed
  • Seed extension or Series A ready

18-Month Milestones ($750K)

  • 150 art installations
  • 3 pharma pilots active
  • $418K ARR
  • 21 CFR Part 11 validated
  • Strong Series A positioning

Ideal Investor Profile

Domain Expertise: Pharmaceutical operations, cryptography/security, or enterprise SaaS
Value-Add: Customer intros (pharma CMC leaders or gallery owners), regulatory guidance, Series A support
Alignment: Believes quantum threat is real, values capital efficiency, patient capital (18-24 month pharma cycles)

Get In Touch

projecthelixHQ@gmail.com

Website launching Q1 2026

Built on Unbreakable Math